President of the Human Rights Campaign, Joe Solmonese, referred to as the choice a "setback" and Ken Choe, the ACLU legal professional who argued on behalf of the plaintiffs, expressed hope that, in contrast to the vast majority of the bench, the general Assembly would be capable to see "that lesbian and gay couples type dedicated relationships and loving families identical to heterosexual couples". Mimi's effort to see her new nephew was rewarded for, as she asserted a few years later, "I knew the second I first set eyes on John that he was going to be one thing special." Mimi's response displayed both nice premonition or, extra possible, pure favoritism. In 1975, Clela Rorex, the Boulder County Clerk, turned the primary county clerk within the nation to challenge marriage licenses to same-cuckquean sex stories couples. Suthers v. Hall offered authorized cover for the Boulder County clerk to concern identical-sex marriage licenses as a type of civil disobedience. However, on July 10, 2014, a day after the Brinkman ruling, District Court Judge Andrew Hartman discovered that whereas Hall violated the law-"There is little argument that Clerk Hall is engaging in a type of civil disobedience. She apparently is taking the position posited by St. Augustine and followed notably by Martin Luther King Jr. that, 'an unjust law is no regulation at all.'"-but he refused to impose a restraining order or injunction upon her, as the state didn't meet its excessive burden for a stay.

U.S. District Judge Raymond P. Moore present in favor of the plaintiffs in Burns on July 23, 2014, granting their movement for a preliminary injunction. They are Brinkman v. Long, a state district court docket case, ruling in favor of same-intercourse marriage; Burns v. Hickenlooper, a U.S. Burns v. Hickenlooper was a similar-sex marriage case filed on July 1, 2014 in the U.S. Suthers v. Hall, a state court docket case which beforehand allowed Boulder County to issue marriage licenses to identical-intercourse couples. When the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed requests to hear an appeal of the Kitchen case on October 6, Attorney General Suthers requested the Tenth Circuit to elevate the keep in this case as it related to Colorado, which might allow the district courtroom's order that Colorado acknowledge similar-intercourse marriages to take effect. When asked to enjoin the Denver County clerk from issuing licenses to similar-sex couples, Judge Crabtree refused to take action. When the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed requests to listen to appeals from comparable cases from the Tenth Circuit on October 6, Attorney General Suthers requested the Tenth Circuit to carry the keep on this case as well, which might allow the district court's order that Colorado recognize identical-sex marriages to take effect.

In a separate filing, and looking for a reversal of Judge Hartman's ruling, Suthers additionally asked the excessive court for an emergency injunction to stop all state clerks from issuing licenses. On July 18, 2014, the Colorado Supreme Court ordered clerks in Adams and Denver counties to stop issuing marriage licenses. After a state district courtroom refused to stop the clerk in Colorado ex rel. Brinkman and McDaniel-Miccio were combined for argument in state district court docket. The couple was joined by 9 other same-sex couples who filed a lawsuit, McDaniel-Miccio v. Hickenlooper, additionally in state district courtroom, in search of the same consequence. Attorney General Suthers filed a motion in state district court in an try to stay the clerk's actions. On July 14, 2014, Attorney General Suthers appealed Judge Crabtree's inaction to the Colorado Supreme Court. District Court for the District of Colorado. On July 9, 2014, District Court Judge C. Scott Crabtree dominated that Colorado's same-sex marriage ban violated the plaintiffs' guarantees of equal protection and due course of under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.

On June 25, 2014, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals within the case of Kitchen v. Herbert dominated that Utah's ban on same-intercourse marriage violated the U.S. The Colorado Supreme Court, sua sponte on July 29, determined to listen to the case and ordered it transferred and requested the report on attraction to be filed earlier than it by October 20, 2014. The Supreme Court stayed Hall from issuing similar-intercourse marriage licenses in the meantime. After being denied a marriage license, a lesbian couple filed a lawsuit on October 30, 2013 in state district court. Immediately after Judge Moore's order was issued, state defendants filed a notice of appeal and requested the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for a keep. In July 2023, a ballot initiative was filed to amend the Constitution of Colorado to take away verbiage limiting marriage to "one man and one girl", and replacing it with the phrase "two consenting adults", thereby eradicating the constitutional prohibition of same-intercourse marriage if passed. The case, Brinkman v. Long, sought to overturn the state's constitutional ban on same-intercourse marriage. Constitution, stating: "No state since United States v. Windsor has been able to justify its ban beneath even the rational basis take a look at, a lot less under the strict scrutiny take a look at." The decide stayed his ruling pending the end result of appeals.